Warning: Constant URL_HTTP already defined in /home/blogsites/jdjournal/www/constants.php on line 5

Warning: Constant ROOT_FOLDER already defined in /home/blogsites/jdjournal/www/constants.php on line 9
Dewey Manages Two Extra Weeks for Bankruptcy Funding - JDJournal Blog
17.4 C
New York
Sunday, October 12, 2025

Buy now

HomeDewey Manages Two Extra Weeks for Bankruptcy Funding

Dewey Manages Two Extra Weeks for Bankruptcy Funding

On Tuesday, Bankruptcy Judge Martin Glenn approved a court filing of Dewey requesting an extension of its funding deadline, which was scheduled to lapse on Tuesday. The extra two weeks Dewey received would help the now defunct law firm some more time to come to a settlement with its former partners and avoid protracted legal battles. Judge Glenn extended the funding deadline of Dewey to Aug.15 as the request also had support from Dewey’s lenders who are allowing the firm to use money pledged to them as collateral.

Dewey is trying to claw back proceeds of “unfinished business” as well as payments made to its former partners in an effort to pay back creditors of the firm. Currently, Dewey has offered a revised version of its original offer for settlement made to former partners. The initial offer for settlement had a target amount of $104 million. Under the new offer, payments made by former partners would range between $5000 and $3.5 million with a maximum targeted recovery amount of $90.4 million.

If the settlement talks fail this time, it is highly unlikely that Dewey’s lenders would continue to fund the Chapter 11 bankruptcy, and it is possible that the case would be converted to liquidation under Chapter 7. Under Chapter 7, a court-appointed trustee would take control of the assets of the firm and would initiate and pursue claw-back claims.


Warning: Constant DOMAIN_JOBSEARCH_URL_HTTP already defined in /home/blogsites/jdjournal/www/wp-content/plugins/jobsearch/jobserach_constants.php on line 7
Sponsored by LC  
What
Where


Under the initial settlement offer made by Dewey to its former partners, the deadline had been sent for July 24. However, considering issues raised by former partners, the firm altered the offer of settlement and asked its lenders and the court for an extension.

Most Popular Articles

Related Articles

RECENT COMMENTS

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

 

Top Legal Job

Most Popular

Legal Career Resources

Create a Free Account

Subscribe or use your Google account to continue

Thank you for subscribing!