Warning: Constant URL_HTTP already defined in /home/blogsites/jdjournal/www/constants.php on line 5

Warning: Constant ROOT_FOLDER already defined in /home/blogsites/jdjournal/www/constants.php on line 9
Federal Judge Prohibits Use of Controversial Terms in Courtroom - JDJournal Blog
16.4 C
New York
Sunday, October 12, 2025

Buy now

Legal NewsFederal Judge Prohibits Use of Controversial Terms in Courtroom

Federal Judge Prohibits Use of Controversial Terms in Courtroom

Lawyers involved in a patent infringement case in the Eastern District of Texas have been prohibited from referring to the court, jurors, or the jury pool with derogatory terms such as “yahoos.” This motion was granted by Chief U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap of the Eastern District of Texas in a Dec. 20 order. The lawyers were also banned from referring to the plaintiff as a “patent factory” and the case as “fake news.” However, the lawyers can refer to the case as “frivolous” in closing arguments to challenge their opponent’s arguments.

The case in question involved the Chamberlain Group and two defendants and was set for a retrial when Gilstrap ruled. The first trial had seen a lawyer for the defendant Overhead Door Corp. tell jurors that the Chamberlain Group had “filed this suit in Marshall, Texas because they think we are yahoos in East Texas; they think we won’t use our common sense.” The defense had also compared the Chamberlain Group to a “patent factory.” The retrial resulted in a victory for the Chamberlain Group and a $46.1 million award for damages. The other defendant in the case is GMI Holdings.

This isn’t the first time Judge Gilstrap has banned specific terms from being used in the courtroom. In the past, he has banned references to plaintiffs as “patent trolls” or “pirates,” “bounty hunters,” “privateers,” or “bandits.” He has also banned references to infringement allegations as a “stickup,” “holdup,” “shakedown,” or “lawsuit lottery.”


Warning: Constant DOMAIN_JOBSEARCH_URL_HTTP already defined in /home/blogsites/jdjournal/www/wp-content/plugins/jobsearch/jobserach_constants.php on line 7
Sponsored by LC  
What
Where


Join thousands of legal professionals who rely on JDJournal for instant access to critical legal news. Subscribe now!

Lawyers must remember to maintain a professional demeanor and language when in the courtroom. The use of inflammatory language can detract from the credibility of the presented legal argument and create a hostile atmosphere in the courtroom. By banning specific terms, Judge Gilstrap is working to ensure that the trial remains focused on the legal issues and that the proceedings are carried out fairly and impartially.

Ready to make a change in your legal career? BCG Attorney Search can help you find the perfect job.

In conclusion, the recent order by Judge Gilstrap to ban potentially inflammatory terms in the Eastern District of Texas patent infringement case is a reminder of the importance of maintaining a professional demeanor and language in the courtroom. By avoiding derogatory terms, lawyers can maintain the integrity of the legal process and ensure that the proceedings are fair and impartial for all parties involved.

REFERENCES:

Federal judge bans potentially inflammatory words, such as ‘yahoos’ and ‘fake news’

Don’t be a silent ninja! Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below.

Most Popular Articles

Related Articles

RECENT COMMENTS

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

 

Top Legal Job

Most Popular

Legal Career Resources

Create a Free Account

Subscribe or use your Google account to continue

Thank you for subscribing!