In the realm of congressional activities, the introduction of legislation addressing a non-existent problem can be a source of frustration. Recently, U.S. Representatives Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA) and Jimmy Panetta (D-CA) co-sponsored House Resolution 7228, aiming to provide concrete copyright protection to golf courses. Dubbed the “Bolstering Intellectual Rights against Digital Infringement Enhancement Act” or the “BIRDIE Act,” this bill was brought forth on Feb. 5.
Background and Purpose of H.R. 7228
At the heart of H.R. 7228 lies a discrepancy in the U.S. Code regarding copyright protection for architectural works. The existing Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act of 1990 safeguards the design of buildings but leaves ambiguity regarding golf course design.
The Debate Surrounding Golf Course Copyright
The sponsors of the bill argue for extending copyright protection to golf course designers, placing them on par with other creators. However, critics question the necessity of such protection and its implications on functional versus creative designs.
Legal Implications and Criticisms
The Useful Article doctrine in U.S. copyright law complicates matters further, distinguishing between the functional and creative aspects of designs. This raises questions about the applicability of copyright law to golf course layouts.
Want to know if you’re earning what you deserve? Find out with LawCrossing’s salary surveys.
Controversies and Considerations
Critics argue that golf course design, while important for gameplay, primarily serves functional purposes rather than purely artistic expression. Moreover, concerns arise about the selective nature of the proposed copyright protection and its potential implications for innovation and competition in the industry.
Proposed Amendments and Coverage
H.R. 7228 seeks to explicitly include golf course designs within the scope of copyright protection, encompassing various elements such as irrigation systems, landscaping, and topographic features. However, the broad scope of protection raises questions about its practicality and enforceability.
Don’t be a silent ninja! Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below.
